🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in graves at risk from coastal erosion say that indecision over how to tackle the issue is causing them avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Historic Graveyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation details a series of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure sites. Officials say it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. People will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Further up the shoreline lies the grave of a ex-soldier who died while working overseas. His mother expressed she could not sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to consider this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families want more coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to proceed for now. Different voices argue the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the options. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires good local conversations to discover the right answers for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in life after death, offering a theological perspective on the physical loss of hallowed earth.